Subscribe to our RSS feeds

Top Stories

  • More ‘savage and grisly’ details emerge in Chicago deadly stabbing


    Chicago Police(CHICAGO) -- A Northwestern University professor, as he allegedly stabbed his boyfriend whom prosecutors say he couldn't subdue, yelled for a second man to help him, according to a court document detailing the alleged murder.

    Wyndham Lathem, a faculty member at Northwestern until he was fired this month after the alleged crime, and the second suspect, Andrew Warren, spent more than a week on the run together after, police say, they killed Lathem's boyfriend, Trenton Cornell-Duranleau.

    Cornell-Duranleau, 26, was found stabbed to death at Lathem's Chicago apartment July 27. Both suspects were taken into custody in California Aug. 4 after a nationwide manhunt.

    The suspects have not been arraigned to face a formal charge but the court document cites first-degree murder. Their attorneys say they are innocent.

    Police Sunday described the crime scene as "savage and grisly."

    Here are some of the details of the crime, according to the court document from the Cook County State's Attorney's Office:

    Lathem, who lived in Chicago, and Warren, who lived in England, had allegedly communicated in an internet chatroom "about carrying out their sexual fantasies of killing others and then themselves."

    Lathem allegedly paid for Warren to come to the United States for them to kill someone and then each other, and a few days before July 27, Lathem met Warren at Chicago's O'Hare airport. Lathem allegedly rented a room for Warren near his apartment.

    On July 26, Lathem allegedly lured the victim to his apartment while texting Warren that they would kill him that night.

    After Cornell-Duranleau went to sleep, Lathem texted Warren and told him to come over, and Lathem allegedly gave Warren a cellphone and told him to record the killing.

    After Lathem allegedly stabbed his boyfriend repeatedly in the neck and chest, the victim woke up and began to scream and fight back.

    Lathem allegedly couldn't control the victim and yelled to Warren to help him.

    "Warren walked into the bedroom and placed his hands over the victim’s mouth to stop him from screaming. The victim bit defendant Warren’s hand and flailed his arms in the struggle," the court document said. "To silence the victim and stop him from moving, defendant Warren struck the victim in the head with a heavy metal lamp."

    Both suspects stabbed the victim, the document said, alleging that "Warren used so much force on the victim that he broke the blade of one of the knives he used."

    The court document said the victim’s last words to Lathem were, "Wyndham, what are you doing?"

    While the victim bled to death in the bedroom, the suspects showered and tried to clean up the scene, the document said.

    The document said a car was rented in Lathem’s name and that he left an anonymous cash donation of $5,610 at the Howard Brown Health Center in the victim's name.

    The court document said after the suspects fled Chicago, Lathem "called the front desk of his apartment building and told front desk security that apartment 1004 should be checked, there had been a crime committed in that room."

    Responding authorities found that the victim had been stabbed 70 times and his head was nearly decapitated, the court document said.

    While the suspects were on the run, Lathem sent a video message to his parents and to friends, admitting "that he killed the victim and that the murder was not an accident," but saying, "he is not the person people thought he was," according to the court document.

    "He admitted that the victim trusted him completely and felt safe with him but that he betrayed that trust," the document said.

    The defendants at one point fled to Lake Geneva, Wisconsin, where Lathem went to the Lake Geneva public library and made a $1,000 cash donation to the library in the victim's name, the document said.

    Lathem's attorney, Barry Sheppard, told ABC News today, "We are representing a brilliant scientist who at this point we believe is innocent."

    Sheppard said Lathem has not yet entered a plea but plans to plead not guilty.

    Sheppard said "we don't accept the facts" presented in the court document, adding, "we are conducting our own independent investigation that will differ substantially from the [court document]."

    Sheppard said no arraignment date has been set.

    Once in custody, Warren allegedly admitted to helping Lathem in the killing, and when asked whether there were any other potential victims, Warren allegedly said there were but said he did not know if that person showed up at Lathem's apartment the next morning after they fled the crime scene.

    Warren allegedly demonstrated for officers how he and Lathem stabbed the victim and Warren said he did not record the killing on the cellphone, the court document said.

    Kulmeet Galhotra of the Cook County Public Defender's office, which is representing Warren, told ABC News today that Warren is "presumed innocent. And we have just been appointed, so we're going to begin our investigation of the case."

    "I anticipate that in a few weeks there will be an arraignment at which he will be entering a plea of not guilty," he said.

    Copyright © 2017, ABC Radio. All rights reserved.

  • Why the U.S. got involved in Afghanistan, and why it's been difficult to get out


    iStock/Thinkstock(NEW YORK) -- The narrative and goals for what has become America’s longest war have shifted in the past 16 years, and they may take a new turn Monday night, as President Donald Trump is expected to announce his policy approach for Afghanistan.

    The war started in October 2001 in the wake of the September 11th attacks, under then-President George W. Bush, and after Obama, Trump is now the second president to inherit -- and have to make a decision on how to handle -- the ongoing conflict.

    When Bush first announced the military action on Oct. 7, 2001, he described “strikes against al Qaeda terrorist training camps and military installations of the Taliban regime in Afghanistan.”

    "These carefully targeted actions are designed to disrupt the use of Afghanistan as a terrorist base of operations, and to attack the military capability of the Taliban regime,” Bush said in an address from the Treaty Room of the White House.

    The timing of the military action is key, as Bush’s announcement came 27 days after coordinates terror attacks that killed nearly 3,000 people in the U.S.

    "The very original reason and the impetus was 9/11,” said Vanda Felbab-Brown, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, She notes how the belief that “the Taliban was sheltering al Qaeda” drove the focus on Afghanistan specifically.

    "The counterterrorism objective became the dominant principle reason for the effort in Afghanistan,” she added.

    Felbab-Brown summarized the Bush team’s initial approach as being, simply put, that they would “’just topple the Taliban and get out’… hence the minimal design of the original operations, the minimal force approach that [then-Secretary of Defense Donald] Rumsfeld promoted.”

    "But very quickly, even the George W. [Bush] administration realized that this was problematic -- that it wasn’t just enough to topple the Taliban, and that it had to leave behind some sort of stable government. But both the W. administration and the Obama administration, and now the Trump administration have been debating that: what is required of the counter terrorism objective,” she said.

    Expanding the goals

    Part of the problem has been that the role of the counterterrorism objective expanded, Felbab-Brown said, noting how "a lot of other interests were added as the mission was developing."

    One such addition was the fight for and promotion of women's rights in Afghanistan, a cause that became a big part of then-first lady Laura Bush's agenda. She gave the president's weekly radio address on Nov. 17, 2001, on the topic, and it coincided with the release of a report titled "Report on the Taliban's War Against Women" by the State Department's Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor.

    "Afghan women know, through hard experience, what the rest of the world is discovering: the brutal oppression of women is a central goal of the terrorists," Laura Bush said in her radio address.

    "Civilized people throughout the world are speaking out in horror -- not only because our hearts break for the women and children in Afghanistan, but also because in Afghanistan we see the world the terrorists would like to impose on the rest of us," she said.

    ”Not a war of choice”

    The theme of the obligation of the war in Afghanistan was seen in speeches by both Bush and Obama. Even in his original Oct. 7 address, Bush said "we did not ask for this mission, but we will fulfill it.”

    A similar sentiment was echoed by Obama eight years later, when he called it a war of necessity during a speech to a Veterans of Foreign Wars group.

    "We must never forget: this is not a war of choice. This is a war of necessity. Those who attacked America on 9/11 are plotting to do so again. If left unchecked, the Taliban insurgency will mean an even larger safe haven from which Al Qaeda would plot to kill more Americans,” Obama said in an Aug. 17, 2009, speech. “So this is not only a war worth fighting. This is fundamental to the defense of our people.”

    Felbab-Brown notes that this speech was in keeping with a larger contrast that Obama painted between Afghanistan and Iraq, indication that the conflict in Afghanistan is necessary, while the one in Iraq is “the bad war,” she said.

    "[Obama] wanted to get out” of Afghanistan, Felbab-Brown said, adding that “he tried” but was unable to, largely because the question of what the goal of the counterterrorism operation was lingered.

    "The core interest is still the counterterrorism objective, but how one goes about achieving it has been a major source of debate for W., Obama and now Trump,” she said.

    Trump’s exact plans have been unknown since he took office. Because of his lack of specifics on the issue in the past, it is not exactly clear what changes – if any – are called for.

    "During the campaign, Trump spoke almost not at all about Afghanistan. It was a non-issue,” she said.

    Copyright © 2017, ABC Radio. All rights reserved.

  • Speaker Ryan on Charlottesville: 'There are no sides'


    Mark Wilson/Getty Images(NEW YORK) -- House Speaker Paul Ryan spoke up forcefully in a Facebook post on Monday against the recent violence in Charlottesville and the death of Heather Heyer, the woman killed when a car plowed into a group of counter protestors.

    “There are no sides,” Ryan wrote in an implicit critique of President Donald Trump, who was rebuked by Democrats and Republicans last week for blaming “both sides” for the violence between white supremacists and counterprotesters in Charlottesville.

    “There is no other argument,” Ryan said in the post, which made no mention of Trump. “We will not tolerate this hateful ideology in our society.”

    Ryan -- who called white supremacy “repulsive” in a statement after Trump’s freewheeling and contentious press conference last Tuesday at Trump Tower -- went on to decry neo-Nazis and their ideology.

    “We all need to make clear there is no moral relativism when it comes to neo-Nazis,” Ryan said. “The notion that anyone is intrinsically superior to anyone else runs completely counter to our founding principles.”

    Ryan said he was camping with his family last week during the protests in Charlottesville. “Our annual camping trip is the kind of time away we really cherish these days,” he said. “Of course, the escape was short-lived, jolted back to reality by what happened in Charlottesville.”

    Ryan posted his reflection Monday morning ahead of a televised town hall with CNN in Racine, Wisconsin.

    Copyright © 2017, ABC Radio. All rights reserved.

  • 'What Would You Do?' recap: Sales clerk refuses to sell clothes to transgender woman


    Purestock/Thinkstock(NEW YORK) -- Here is a recap of this week's episode of "What Would You Do?" with ABC's John Quiñones.

    What would you do: Shopping while transgender

    A transgender woman is shopping for a dress at a women’s boutique. The sales clerk refuses to sell clothes to her because she is transgender. How will the other customers react? Watch what happens:

    What would you do: Pedi harassment

    A nail technician discriminates against a woman for being overweight, charging her extra money simply based on her size. Will anyone say something to the technician? Watch what happens:

    What would you do: Baby or bag

    A mother has been shopping excessively, spending nearly all her cash on shoes and clothes. She has just enough money for groceries for the week, but then spots one more outfit she would like to purchase. Her daughter tries to stop her but she is determined. What will the other shoppers say? Watch what happens:

    What would you do: Overprotective mom

    A mother is with her son at a sporting goods store. She is trying to buy the son a new pair of soccer cleats, when the son sees a pair of football cleats. He tells his mom he wants to play football instead, and she immediately shuts the idea down. Mom cites the health concerns regarding the sport, especially given the recent attention paid to CTE, caused by repeated blows to the head. The son tries to plead with the mom, but she isn’t budging. Will any of the other customers interject? Watch what happens:

    What would you do: The breakup

    A guy is breaking up with his girlfriend of one year while on a park bench. He is being loud, and his girlfriend is clearly distraught. As she sits there crying, will anyone try to console her? Watch what happens:

    Copyright © 2017, ABC Radio. All rights reserved.

  • NFL close to extending Commissioner Roger Goodell's current deal


    Allen Kee/ESPN Images(NEW YORK) -- The National Football League and its commissioner Roger Goodell are close to agreeing on a new five-year extension that runs through 2024, according to ESPN. The deal was first reported by the Sports Business Journal.

    ESPN's Adam Schefter says while a deal is likely, talks have not progressed as expected due to some issues with the deal.

    ESPN reports Goodell made $32 million during the 2015 fiscal year, citing the league's 2015 tax filing, and has surpassed $200 million since becoming commissioner in 2006.

    An extension would mark the third time in Goodell's tenure that the league has agreed to rework his deal. He was extended in 2009 and again in 2012.

    Goodell's current deal expires in 2019.

    Copyright © 2017, ABC Radio. All rights reserved.

  • Watch now: Netflix unveils trailer for Marvel's "The Punisher"


    Netflix/Jessica Miglio(NEW YORK) -- Just three days after its latest Marvel series, The Defenders, went live on Netflix, the streaming network released a trailer for its next effort, The Punisher.

    Spun off from the second season of its hit Daredevil series, The Punisher again features fan favorite Jon Bernthal as one of Marvel's most popular heroes: former elite soldier Frank Castle, who uses his skills to mercilessly hunt down criminals of every stripe after his family was murdered.  

    In the sneak peek, Castle takes a sledgehammer to a concrete floor, perhaps to unearth a weapons cache.

    "All the things that I'd done," Castle says in a gravelly voiceover. "Memories, they never hurt me. But the past is more than memories. It's the Devil you sold your soul to. He's coming. He's coming to collect."

    Netflix's announcement notes, "After exacting revenge on those responsible for the death of his wife and children, Frank Castle uncovers a conspiracy that runs far deeper than New York’s criminal underworld. Now known throughout the city as The Punisher, he must discover the truth about injustices that affect more than his family alone."

    As for when we'll see the series, all we know is sometime this year.

    Count Charlie Cox, who plays Daredevil, as an eager fan. He told ABC Radio of seeing Bernthal in action again: "I'm excited about that. I'm excited to watch that as a fanboy, you know?"

    [youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sDp4AuNen0Y&w=640&h=360]

    Copyright © 2017, ABC Radio. All rights reserved. 

  • Chilean courts ease strict abortion laws in the nation


    Wavebreak Media/Thinkstock(NEW YORK) -- BBC News reports Chilean constitutional court have approved a bill that would lessen regulations when it comes to abortions, a ruling that goes against a total ban.

    The court ruled that abortion is justified in three cases: if the mother's life is at risk, if they fetus is not expected to survive pregnancy, if a woman was impregnated after rape.

    According to BBC News, Chile had been one of seven Roman Catholic nations that ruled against abortion in any circumstance.

    Judges ruled 6-4 in favor of easing on abortion laws, a welcome result for a number of groups in the South American nation.

    Chile legalized abortion for medical reasons in 1931, according to BBC News, but banned it completely in 1989 under the country's then-military government.

    Copyright © 2017, ABC Radio. All rights reserved.

Area Weather

KOKOMO
Kokomo Weather
LAFAYETTE
Lafayette Weather
FRANKFORT
Frankfort Weather
LOGANSPORT
Logansport Weather

Now On the Air

On the air now.
pump-patrol
lewis01

friday-frenzy-header

Watch here for more Friday Frenzy Deals!

MORE GREAT BARGAINS

LISTEN LIVE
farmers-bank
PET-OF-THE-DAY
ENCOMPASS